Summer Academics? Yes and No, Say the Experts
In an increasingly competitive world, many parents push their kids to
do schoolwork during
the summer. While a recent study suggests that
this is beneficial — even vital — opinion
among education experts
remains sharply divided.
For example, Greta Pennell, associate professor of education
at the University of Indianapolis,
says that children learn through
many different activities, and "all book-learning all the time" is
not
always the best way to go. "Kids need playtime and downtime," she says.
"While it's
important for them not to lose ground over the summer, they
shouldn't be drilled and killed
either. Anything academic needs to be
moderated with true free time that can include
enrichment and fun
things that kids normally wouldn't do in school."
Pennell advocates less structured learning over the summer
months. "There's a lot of pressure
now that everything has to be about
academics and book-learning, but a lot of what kids learn
is hands on,"
she says. "And, kids will probably remember more learning
experientially rather
than just reading it in a book."
Pennell recommends parents look for activities that can
include a "teaching moment" —
a time where they can teach the child
something new or spark conversation. She suggests:
- Visiting a state park. In addition to outdoor activities, state parks are great places to
- learn about history and science.
- Taking
swimming lessons. While it may not seem academically oriented, children
will
- learn through the programs and they are still getting instruction,
so when they get back
- in school, they are still in the mindset of
having to listen and follow directions.
- Attending
festivals and fairs. Summers abound with music and cultural festivals
and
- county fairs, all of which are great opportunities for kids to
explore many topics.
- Shopping at a farmers market. The
market provides a new, stimulating environment. Curious children may
ask where things come from, and sellers are often happy to
- answer
questions about their goods.
Pennell says the main thing is to let kids have time to be kids. "Allow
kids some space so they
can find out what really interests them," she
explains. "Give them unstructured times where
they have to plan what
they are going to do — it takes a lot of thinking skills to plan a
day." She
also encourages parents to be actively involved with their
children. "When you make time to do something with your children,
follow through with it," she says. "And don't multitask when spending
time with your kids — that will really go a long way."
Compare Pennell's advice to a recent study by Johns Hopkins
sociologists Karl Alexander,
Doris Entwisle and Linda Steffel Olson,
which blames summer vacations in part for the fact
that low-income
children lag behind their more privileged classmates in high school
graduation rates and college attendance.
In "Lasting Consequences of the Summer Learning Gap," published in the April 2007 issue
of the American Sociological Review (ASR)
they contend that there is a summer learning gap between lower- and
higher-income children that begins during elementary school.
Higher-income children's home environments are resource rich. They are
more likely to have
access to magazines and books, and to have their
parents read to them.
Consequently, an education gap accumulates over the years and
results in unequal placements
in college preparatory tracks once the
children get to high school. The gap also increases the chances that
children from low socio-economic families will drop out of high school
and
decreases their chances of attending a four-year college.
The researchers studied 790 Baltimore Public School children
from the 1st grade through
age 22. They used testing data to track
learning patterns, school records and student reports
to identify
students' high school curriculum placement, and student interview data
to
determine high school completion and college attendance.
These findings are significant because once disadvantaged
children get to high school, their achievement test scores are far
below those of higher-income children. Achievement test scores,
of
course, play an important role in academic placement.
"What we are able to do is trace back in time the disparities
between the two groups of children, and to a very substantial degree,
we trace the difference back to summer learning differences
over the
elementary school years," says Karl Alexander, the study's lead author.
Alexander believes that programs aimed at narrowing the
achievement gap between lower-
and higher-income students should begin
in elementary school or even earlier. To be most
effective, such
programs should provide year-round attention to disadvantaged children
to
offset the out-of-school conditions that hold them back.
"What it boils down to is that we need to stop these children
from falling behind. We have to
help them have experiences over the
summer months that build academic skills, such as high quality summer
school programs or year-round schooling. In a nutshell, disadvantaged
children depend more on school-like experiences in acquiring academic
skills in order to succeed,
whereas higher-income children can and do
acquire these skills at home."
What, then, are parents to do? One reading of these seemingly
contradictory expert opinions is
that high-income parents should ease
up on their kids' academics, while lower-income parents should push
them harder. Or not.
April 9, 2007